Charges may be dropped for co-accused in wharf burning

Release conditions have been lifted for a woman charged with arson in relation to the burning of the Walton wharf.
Nova Scotia Legal Aid lawyer Karen Armour requested the undertaking conditions imposed on Kelsey Moore, of Hantsport, be dropped during an appearance in Windsor provincial court April 30.
Crown prosecutor Bill Fergusson told Judge Claudine MacDonald he was fine with Armour’s request, but emphasized that he is not requesting that the arson charge laid against Moore be withdrawn until her co-accused, Justin Shrum, of Walton, is sentenced on July 8.
“We don’t expect to proceed with Ms. Moore,” Fergusson said.
Shrum’s release conditions were altered to allow him to have contact with Moore in Windsor provincial court April 29. Shrum, who was originally charged with arson along with Moore in September 2012 at the age of 29, waived his right to a trial and pleaded guilty to the lesser offense of mischief during the same court appearance.
Moore, who was 28 when the arson charge was laid, is also facing a separate assault charge. She is due back in Windsor provincial court June 3 to enter a plea in the assault matter, and July 8 for disposition regarding the arson charge.
Several community members turned to a Facebook page called the “The Walton Wharf and What It Once Was” to lament upon losing the wharf, which was deemed irreparable after the fire and torn down. The wharf has long been considered a historic feature of the tiny, rural town.

Boston Marathon Bombing Police Radio Traffic 4-15-13 - Firefighters Dispatch and Alert Page!

Would You Lay With Me (In A Field Of Stone) by Nona in the style of Tanya Tucker

Nona Marisa Mc- (Cover) I Fall To Pieces Patsy Cline

Footage of Martial Law Tactics in Watertown, Massachusetts - 4/19/2013

LivingSocial Hacked, 50 Million Users' Data at Risk

Selena Gomez 'When The Sun Goes Down'' photoshoot

Katie Holmes Giorgio Armani Haute Couture FW 2011-2012 Show. Paris Fashion Week 05.07.2011

What Are Chicken Nuggets Made Of?

Boston Becoming A Very Very Real Hoax - Morris

Couple abort girl because they wanted a boy

Dr Mark Hobart has reported an abortion specialist to the Australian Medical Board for providing an abortion to a couple who wanted a boy instead of a girl. Picture: Jon Hargest Source: Herald Sun

 

A MELBOURNE doctor has blown the whistle on parents who demanded an abortion - because they didn't want a girl.
And obstetricians have proposed keeping the sex of unborn babies secret until it is too late to terminate, to prevent gender-based abortions.
In an exclusive interview with the Sunday Herald Sun, Dr Mark Hobart revealed a Melbourne couple had asked him to refer them to an abortion clinic after discovering at 19 weeks they were having a girl, when they wanted a boy.
Dr Hobart said he refused to give them a referral and reported the specialist, who later terminated the pregnancy, to the Medical Board.
"The parents were upfront and told me that was the reason for the abortion," Dr Hobart said.
"I was dumbfounded. To get a request for an abortion for that reason, I just couldn't believe it. It was the husband who did all the talking - he was so insistent."

Should gender be an issue when aborting a baby? Vote and have your say
Despite being refused a referral by Dr Hobart, the woman had an abortion a few days later.
The Medical Board told Dr Hobart on Friday it would not pursue the matter because Victorian doctors are allowed to terminate pregnancies of up to 24 weeks.
One of Melbourne's biggest abortion clinics has revealed that couples have requested abortions on gender grounds - although it is "extremely rare" and always refused.
And a Senate committee is inquiring into draft legislation prepared by "pro-life" Democratic Labor Party Senator John Madigan, which would ban Medicare rebates for gender-selective abortions.
The inquiry is also investigating "the prevalence of gender selection - with preference for a male child - among some ethnic groups".
Senator Madigan said that "we do know there are cultures where a boy is preferred over a girl", although he did not have statistics on the prevalence in Australia.
The National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has suggested that laboratories that perform publicly funded chromosomal tests during pregnancy be banned from revealing the sex of the embryo until after 20 weeks, except in cases of gender-based diseases such as haemophilia.
"You don't keep the test results secret, you just keep the sex secret," association president Andrew Foote told the Sunday Herald Sun.
Dr Foote said while he had no first-hand knowledge of gender-based abortion, "I think it does happen".
"The view among my colleagues is they're definitely against it," he said.
"But if (patients) were of a view they must have a baby of a particular sex, they could turn up at a termination clinic and say it is for social reasons."
Dr Foote said that keeping the baby's sex secret until 20 weeks would be a "reasonable safeguard".
But Australian Medical Association president Steve Hambleton said women had the right to know everything about their pregnancy.
The Fertility Control Clinic - Victoria's biggest abortion provider - told the Senate inquiry that 96 per cent of abortions were performed before 12 weeks' gestation, when it is too early to know the sex.
"It is extremely rare for us to receive requests for gender-selection abortion and we do not acquiesce to such requests," the clinic's submission states.
The clinic's psychologist, Dr Susie Allanson, said patients only requested gender-based abortions "once in a blue moon".
"It's very rare, and we have to say (to the patient) we don't provide abortion on the basis of gender," she said.
"But there would be nothing to stop a woman from going elsewhere and giving a different reason."
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists president Michael Permezel said there was no evidence that babies were being aborted because they were the non-preferred sex.
"I don't think there is any doctor that would perform an abortion on those grounds," he said.
A spokesman for Health Minister Tanya Plibersek said surgical termination of a pregnancy was a "clinical matter".
"As with all other clinical matters, it is a matter for the professional clinical judgment of a doctor in consultation with a patient," he said.

Mixed Walllpaper-X-57

<