The Avon River Causeway replaced an existing road bridge upriver from
town and also resulted in the rerouting of the Dominion Atlantic
Railway's Halifax-Yarmouth main line which used to run through Windsor's
downtown, crossing the river on a bridge parallel to the road bridge
immediately upriver from the town.
The
causeway controls the Avon River's discharge and the incoming tidal
waters of the Minas Basin through a series of flood control gates which
are intended to regulate the river's flowage to prevent flooding of
agricultural lands upriver near Martock. The section of the Avon River
upriver of the causeway along the Windsor waterfront is now the
freshwater Pesaquid Lake.
The construction of the causeway has dramatically affected the Avon
River downstream from Windsor, with large parts of the once-navigable
river now being obstructed by large mud flats and vegetation, owing to
the lack of tidal exchange and freshwater discharge. The nature writer
Harry Thurston has noted, "Almost before the last stone was put in
place, sediment began to accumulate to an alarming rate - 5 to 14
centimetres per month. Within seven years, a four metre high island of
silt formed on the seaward side of the causeway; and the effects were
felt 20 kilometres downstream, where two metres of mud impaired
navigation at Hantsport."
Researchers soon discovered that the mud flats had become a biological
desert, devoid of life, as the sediments were too soft to support
organisms. The need to monitor and assess the impacts of such changes
gave impetus to a greater interest in Bay of Fundy ecosystem and the
ultimate establishment of the Acadia Centre for Estuarine Research in
Wolfville.
Recently announced plans for the expansion of Highway 101 between the
Halifax Regional Municipality and the eastern end of the Annapolis
Valley have raised concerns about maintaining the Avon River causeway.
An environmental lobby group, Friends of the Avon River (FAR), has
called for studies into the possibility of removing the causeway
entirely and carrying the expressway and railway line on a new bridge,
allowing the natural flow of the river course to be reestablished. FAR
has also recently begun to oppose the expansion of gypsum quarries
within the river's watershed because of threats to river life, citing
the use de-watering runoff from the quarries.
A decision in August 2007 by the New Brunswick government to remove a
similar causeway (constructed in 1968) blocking the Petitcodiac River,
another tribuatary of the Bay of Fundy, to avoid facing charges under
the federal Fisheries Act, is expected to have ramnifications for the
Avon River causeway.
A government hired expert team (AMEC) who assessed the Petitcodiac River
in New Brunswick, Canada (for a similar problem). The team visited the
causeway in Nova Scotia and clearly documented, "there is no proper
fish passageway at the Avon River Causeway". The Friends of Avon River
group wants this changed.
For the past seven years, the FAR group has been asking the Minister to
treat this river just like they did on the Petitcodiac River, in New
Brunswick. There, a 'comprehensive environmental impact assessment
study' was conducted to explore whether or not the barrier should be
opened, so free tidal-flow could again take place. Every scientific
field involved, from fish biologists to sedimentologists agreed the only
solution was to have the barrier opened.
Everyone can agree the Avon River Causeway is a detriment to the
waterway. Dr. Mike Brylinsky, a research associate at the Acadia Centre
for Estuarine Research in Wolfville, Nova Scotia, is quoted in a 2006
press release written by Wendy Elliot, (The Kentville Advertiser)
saying, "hindsight has determined that the Avon River causeway should
not have been built, but the fact remains it was."
"It's pretty obvious to anyone with their
thinking-cap on. The Canadian Government just approved about
$70-million dollars on the Petitcodiac. They seriously don't want
anyone to know that they're turning a blind eye on the only other river,
which faces this identical situation. They already know what the fix
is going to entail, because the Avon River is a virtual mirror image of
the Petitcodiac problem." --Ms. Wood.
As well, tributaries like the St. Croix , Kennetcook and Cogmagun Rivers
(also salmon producing rivers) are being stressed by the same barrage
barrier.
"Minister Shea is side-stepping this environmental embarrassment just
like the previous Minister did. When will she entrusted to protecting
our fisheries stop playing games with this issue", says chair of the FAR
group, Sonja Wood.
"There is NO PROPER fish-passageway at the causeway on the infamous
salmon and eel producing Avon River. For the past seven years FAR has
been trying to get Fisheries Ministers to order a preliminary study
(like the one that started the ball rolling at the Petitcodiac) for the
Avon River, but the answer is still "no", say's Ms Wood. This is what
the citizens action group feels is absolutely beyond the pale.
[Above: According to Hank Kolstee (DoA), he was standing in three
feet of water here while droves of fishes were rushing past against his
legs. The NS Department of Agriculture manages these gates, and only
open them to do maintenance work or to lower the water in Ôthe lakeÕ.
Open them, and fish will come. Keep them closed during fish migrations,
and the river will die.
Manager, Hank Kolstee (DoA) and gate-keeper, Ken Carroll admitted,
"...they know for a fact there are salmon in this river and Ken actually
had friends that caught salmon just last spring (2006)..." He said
this in the presence of Department of Fisheries area manager, Gus Van
Helvoort, and FAR group member, Chris Mansky. A few minutes later Gus
VanHelvoort of the Department of Fisheries was asked if he heard these
officials admit this, and he agreed he had. But he requested both Sonja
Wood and Chris Mansky not to reveal these comments to the press.
Instead, he would have these gentlemen admit this to a room of
Department of Fisheries officials. This was not done, and was
apparently just a hush tactic from the Fisheries department.
Meanwhile a study into fish populations and the environment of the Avon
River already exists. In 2005, Dalhousie environmental scientist Lisa
Isaacman wrote her Masters' Thesis on the history of this watershed, and
her conclusions are very revealing. She shows how the Fisheries
officials were less than commendable in their actions in 1968 when the
causeway was being requested.
It appears the river had greater numbers of fish than they reported on,
and the decision to allow construction was corrupted by special
interests in the region who wanted the causeway at all costs. Isaacman
also details the impact of the causeway, and questions the validity of
any of the 'fish-counts' done in recent years.
The writing is there on the wall, and Minister Shea has received copies
of this Thesis. However, the Minister will not acknowledge the
existence of this scientific document to the group that's asking her to
read it.
Instead, the Department of Fisheries has for three-years shunted the FAR
group and their concerns off to the "inner Bay of Fundy salmon-recovery
team", whose concern for the salmon is focused on "rivers of priority".
In 2006, Department of Fisheries drafted a document entitled
"Rationale for Inner Bay of Fundy Salmon Priority Rivers for Recovery".
This document admits the salmon-producing potential of the Avon river,
but ranks it lowest amongst all the 50 "priority rivers", largely
because it would be so costly to fix.
This, as discussed below, is just scare-talk -- something to put a
negative spin to the Avon River rescue notion. In as such,
"Rationale..." is a piece of junk scientifically, and not worth the
paper it is written on. This comes as no surprise to the FAR group,
because the authors of that paper all work for the province, primarily
for the Department of Fisheries.
Any help that is to come to this 'river in distress' will not come from
the Provincial level Department of Fisheries, but rather the Federal
one. This is one little piece of wisdom we have gained from our
colleagues who've won their 'just cause' on the Petitcodiac, in New
Brunswick.
"Time is truly running out here," says Sonja, "because of the highway
101 twinning project, we are facing a time when changes are going to be
made to this structure. If we don't get it right this time, when will
government want to revisit the obvious or will they? Or will it be like
our own MP Scott Brison ill-advisably told us in 2005, that we should
'wait until the causeway totally kills the river (so you have all your
proof), then sue the government."
FAR group recommends the Department of Fisheries stop crying this would be too costly
This twinning is a blessing in disquise to the FAR group. The
Department of Transportation have announced they will be building a
6-lane bridge to cross the active channel at that critical part of the
causeway the group calls 'the sluicegates'. The bridge will be no
impediment to the tides should the offending 'gates' be opened to allow
free tidal flow.
"The
project just became far less costly because the highway is building its
bridge already. This means the return to free tidal flow can be had at
about a third of the cost, because it will only be a matter of
demolishing these gates, widening the opening through now-unused stretch
of causeway, and refurbishing the now-dilapitated dykes and seawalls.
An engineer can tell you this is very doable, and definitely technically
and economically feasible."
The Department of Fisheries 'Science-Advice' report (Amiro, et al, 2006)
therefore supports the recovery of the Avon River. Their wording
suggests we expand to the 'priority 4' rivers after covering all the 1-3
rated rivers. The FAR group reiterates this is wrong thinking for
'Science Advice', since the highway twinning should be our trigger to do
something once and for all. In relation to this project, an
Environmental Impact Statement is currently being prepared.
"This EA should be far broader than the one Gail Shea is implementing,"
says Wood. With millions of dollars going to be spent to build a bridge
at the channel where there is an existing sluice gate (not a suitable
fish passage) the group recommends this be the time to spend
Provincial/Federal monies correctly and repair this critically horrific
mess.
"The fact this Minister fought so passionately for fish in Prince Edward
Island, and can now turn her back on the Atlantic Salmon, American Eel,
and their 'critical habitats' in Nova Scotia, tells me sheÕs not the
woman for the job. She has effectively become 'the Rona Ambrose of
Fisheries and Oceans'. All we really want is for her to shoulder the
responsibility. She needs to stop pushing this issue off onto
committees that have other agendas and seriously put this issue under
the microscope for a minute."
The causeway belongs to Dept of Agriculture, the Dept. of Transportation
is building a bridge and widening the causeway, and the Dept. of
Fisheries is responsible for fish passageway and the protection of the
endangered Atlantic salmon. All of these are federally related issues
and will be cost shared by the Province of NS. Therefore, there are
three departments to withdraw monies.
A Positive Spin:
"Windsor will truly become the magnificent gateway to the Valley.
The town will receive a face-lift, and return to its seaside identity.
The acclamation to the Town of Windsor for having reversed the hands
of time on the 'fastest and highest' rising tides in the world, and for
recovering the critical habitat of these endangered Atlantic Salmon and
American Eel, will be commendable and inspirational to an
environmentally-aware world..." --offers Sonja.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment