For decades, the U.S. government has made compulsory childhood vaccination one of the cornerstones of its public health policy. Outside the U.S., countries’ vaccination policies range from completely voluntary to “aggressive,”
with some nations promoting vaccination but leaving the decision up to
the individual, and others pushing a little harder by financially
incentivizing vaccination. Some of the countries with mandatory
vaccination have “modest” policies that focus on a single vaccine such
as polio, and some—with broader mandates on the books—choose not to
enforce them. Regardless of the policy, no other country requires as many childhood vaccines as the U.S., but the legal edifice shoring up the compulsory childhood vaccine program is surprisingly flimsy. As New York University legal scholar Mary Holland explains in a 2010 working paper, this edifice relies primarily on two century-old Supreme Court decisions—from 1905 and 1922—and on the game-changing National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986, which fundamentally altered the legal landscape for vaccination by exempting vaccine manufacturers and medical practitioners from liability for childhood vaccine injuries. Read More Here Related Medical Doctor Calls Out Mainstream Media for Reporting Fake Numbers of Flu Deaths in Order to Sell More Flu Vaccinewhy-do-they-give-out-free-flu-vaccines?RFK, Jr. Proves HHS is in Violation of the “Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccines” as Stipulated in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act |
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
Vaccine Mandates Results Don’t Safeguard Children’s Rights or Health: How Did We Get Here?
Labels:
info
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment