Source: www.rumble.com/v1h90f3-august-25-2022.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2
This breakdown of The Ethical Skeptic’s article “Houston, We Have a Problem (Part 1/3)” analyzes data from US National Center for Health’s International Classification of Diseases and the CDC.
The Ethical Skeptic analyzed the following data sets as published by the CDC: Weekly Counts of Deaths 2014-2019, Weekly Provisional Counts of Deaths 2020-2022, and Provisional Mortality Statistics 2018 through Last Month.
The article provides an accurate accounting of methodologies used, but to offer an overly simplified summary, the Weekly Counts establish a pre-Covid baseline, and the other two sets (Provisional Counts and Provisional Mortality) figure a Covid baseline and measure significant changes in mortality and morbidity across these baselines.
Significant anomalous spikes in mortality and morbidity emerge after April 10th 2021 as well as December 11th 2021, corresponding to the majority of Covid injections administered. These represent significant safety signals which should have already prompted more rigorous investigation and safety studies.
These spikes and anomalies are found in spite of retroactive changes in disease data classification as well as the outright removal of data for the CDC’s “system upgrade” starting June 6th 2022.
Read the referenced article here:
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/08/20/houston-we-have-a-problem-part-1-of-3/
No comments:
Post a Comment